The six genealogy exhibits below are invented for this demonstration. Real projects link findings to real records. The archive photographs are credited separately.
How the branches connect
The fictional packet connects William Carter and Nora Wells to their son Thomas, and Samuel Reed and Evelyn Brooks to their daughter Ruth. Thomas and Ruth’s marriage joins the branches; Alice is their daughter. The two families’ earlier ancestors remain outside this agreed example scope.
S1 · Family register
The Carter household
Fictional demonstration exhibit. Carter–Reed packet, CR-01, invented register: William Carter 1895–1973; Nora Wells 1899–1982; married 1921; their son Thomas born 9 January 1925.
Demonstration evidence for the Carter relationships, not a real register.
S2 · Family register
The Reed household
Fictional demonstration exhibit. Carter–Reed packet, CR-02, invented register: Samuel Reed 1901–1988; Evelyn Brooks 1904–1995; married 1926; their daughter Ruth born 16 August 1927.
The Reed branch is documented separately so its relationships do not depend on the Carter story.
S3 · Marriage record
The families meet
Fictional demonstration exhibit. Carter–Reed packet, CR-03, invented marriage abstract, 10 September 1949: Thomas Carter, son of William Carter and Nora Wells; Ruth Reed, daughter of Samuel Reed and Evelyn Brooks.
A second exhibit names both sets of parents and connects the two family registers. No real marriage certificate is asserted.
S4 · Family announcement
Alice joins the tree
Fictional demonstration exhibit. Carter–Reed packet, CR-04, invented announcement dated 22 May 1952: daughter Alice, born 20 May, to Thomas and Ruth Carter. The packet states Ruth’s birth surname as Reed.
Alice is fictional. No real living person’s personal information is represented.
S5 · Family recollection
Two ways of coming home
Fictional demonstration exhibit. Carter–Reed packet, CR-05, invented recollection attributed to Alice in 1999: the Carters used the back entrance and kept a biscuit tin; the Reeds rang the front bell and set out cups before visitors arrived.
Separate attributed household memories, not evidence of a family-wide personality or social class.
S6 · Family correspondence
The table after the wedding
Fictional demonstration exhibit. Carter–Reed packet, CR-06, invented note from Ruth, October 1949: “Your mother’s little table fits by the window. Mine has sent the cloth, so we have something from both houses.” A fictional family memorial list gives Thomas 1925–2001 and Ruth 1927–2008.
The note links household objects with both families. It does not identify a photograph or prove the table survives.
Questions for another chapter
Which grandparents belong to which parent?
Compared both registers with the marriage abstract. Carter/Wells are Thomas’s parents; Reed/Brooks are Ruth’s.
The tree and source notes retain the two distinct paths.
How does Alice connect to both branches?
Correlated the announcement with the marriage and registers. Thomas and Ruth are the connecting parents in the fictional packet.
A real project would check the original records and permissions for living relatives.
Can the tree extend to all four great-grandparent families?
Reviewed the agreed two-branch packet. Those earlier relationships are not supplied or claimed.
An extension needs a new research question, time allowance, and custom quote.