This short example shows how a finding, its evidence, and the remaining questions can be presented together.
Keepsake RootsFamily-history findings · Public sample
The Miller family · Iowa · 1910
A family venture in electric light.
Research question: What do contemporary reports establish about C. Miller & Son’s electricity venture in 1910?
The finding
Three trade-journal notices add dated milestones to the venture described in the Miller family biographies. They document a Clermont franchise and turbine plans in January, followed by franchise news for Ossian and Calmar in July.
The evidence, in order
- 27 January 1910: Electrical World reports that C. Miller & Son had secured a Clermont franchise. Trump turbines are described as planned machinery. [1]
- 7 July 1910: A notice reports an Ossian franchise and a Calmar vote scheduled for that day. [2]
- 14 July 1910: A follow-up reports that Calmar voters granted the franchise on 7 July. [2]
What remains open: A franchise is an authorization, not proof of completed installation or the first day of service. No operating date is claimed from these notices.
Why it matters
This gives the family’s business story a timeline supported by reporting from the period. The notices name the firm; connecting it to Christian and John Frederick Miller also relies on the family biographies in the 1910 Fayette County history.
The next research step
Look for commissioning or first-current announcements after July 1910, and compare them with Calmar and Ossian council minutes.
Sources
[1] Electrical World, vol. 55, 27 January 1910, printed p. 251, “Trump Turbines” notice. Internet Archive, volume 55.
[2] Electrical World, vol. 56, 7 and 14 July 1910, bound-volume PDF pages 91 and 147; Ossian and Calmar notices. The printed name varies between “Son” and “Sons.” Internet Archive, volume 56.